Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Joe Biden
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article's title and content suggest a dramatic political maneuver without providing solid evidence, which is sensationalist.
Provide evidence for claims, use a more neutral tone, and avoid speculative language.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests that Michelle Obama is working on a White House bid, but the article does not provide concrete evidence to support this claim.
Rewrite the headline to reflect the speculative nature of the content or provide evidence to support the claim.
Use of language that is not neutral and shows author's preferences.
Terms like 'sicko political environment', 'dodo-in-chief', and 'squalid squad' indicate a lack of neutrality.
Use neutral language and avoid derogatory terms.
Claims that are made without evidence or support.
Statements like 'Obama has polled donors' and 'Michelle gets nominated' are presented without evidence.
Provide sources or evidence for claims or present them as speculation.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses emotionally charged language to create a sense of urgency and fear about the political situation.
Focus on facts and logical arguments rather than emotional language.
Presenting one side of a story or issue without fair representation of opposing perspectives.
The article focuses heavily on negative aspects of the political environment and potential strategies without providing balanced viewpoints.
Include perspectives and opinions from multiple sides of the political spectrum.
Use of sources without names or clear identification.
The article cites 'credible sources few have access to' and a 'VIP doctor' without providing further identification.
Identify sources with more specificity or provide verifiable information.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.