Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Dean Phillips
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The title and phrases like 'quixotic primary challenge' and 'tilts at an octogenarian windmill' sensationalize the content.
Use a more neutral title and avoid metaphorical language that dramatizes the challenge.
Use of language that implies a judgment or takes a non-neutral stance.
Terms like 'quixotic', 'strangest of settings', and 'glorified shadow boxing' indicate a bias against Dean Phillips' campaign.
Use neutral language to describe the campaign and its challenges.
Leaving out information that is important to understanding the full context.
The article does not provide sufficient context on Joe Biden's achievements or counterarguments to Phillips' criticisms.
Include information on Biden's accomplishments and any responses to the criticisms made by Phillips.
Presenting one side more favorably than the other without a neutral stance.
The article focuses heavily on the criticisms of Biden by Phillips and the perceived weaknesses of his campaign, without equal coverage of Biden's perspective or campaign strengths.
Provide a balanced view by including more information on Biden's campaign and its supporters' perspectives.
Claims made without evidence to support them.
Statements like 'the most dangerous man in American history' are strong and lack substantiation within the article.
Provide evidence or context for strong claims, or present them as opinions rather than facts.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.