Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article's title suggests a 'clash' between Jennifer Aniston and George Clooney which is a sensational portrayal of a disagreement.
Rephrase the title to reflect a more neutral perspective on the disagreement.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline implies a significant conflict between Jennifer Aniston and George Clooney, which is not substantiated by the content.
Ensure the headline accurately reflects the content of the article.
Taking quotes out of their original context to change their meaning.
The quotes from the body language expert may be taken out of context to suggest a direct connection to the disagreement over honoring Matthew Perry.
Provide full quotes with sufficient context to avoid misinterpretation.
Presenting one side of a story more favorably than the other without a fair representation of both.
The article seems to focus more on the sensational aspects of the disagreement rather than presenting a balanced view of both perspectives.
Include more information and perspectives to balance the reporting.
Choosing sources that support one side of an argument while ignoring others.
The article relies on a single source, the National Enquirer, which is known for sensational reporting.
Use multiple, credible sources to provide a well-rounded view of the situation.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses emotional language to describe Jennifer Aniston's state and the circumstances of Matthew Perry's death.
Use neutral language that does not play on the reader's emotions.
Claims that are presented without sufficient evidence or support.
The article mentions allegations of Matthew Perry 'assaulting women' without providing evidence or further context.
Provide evidence for claims or clarify when information is alleged or not confirmed.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.