Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article's title and content focus on 'marital struggles' and 'heated argument' to attract attention.
Provide a more neutral headline and avoid focusing on unverified personal conflicts.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests definitive 'marital struggles' which are not substantiated within the article.
Ensure the headline accurately reflects the content of the article.
Claims that lack supporting evidence or sources.
The article makes several claims about the couple's relationship without providing evidence, relying on an anonymous 'insider'.
Provide evidence for the claims made or clarify the speculative nature of the information.
Use of sources without names or identifiable positions, which can undermine credibility.
The article quotes an 'insider' without revealing their identity or explaining their connection to the couple.
Identify sources where possible or explain why anonymity is necessary.
Manipulation of the audience's emotions in order to win an argument, especially in the absence of factual evidence.
The article plays on the reader's emotions by describing the couple's relationship as a series of 'hills and valleys'.
Stick to factual reporting and avoid language that is designed to elicit an emotional response.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.