Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
NASA
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article's focus on Elon Musk's alleged drug use and the speculative language used to discuss the handling of his urine samples are sensationalist.
Stick to verified facts and avoid speculative language.
Statements that are intended to deceive or mislead.
The article implies that Elon Musk's drug use is a given fact, despite referring to them as 'allegations' and 'unverified insider claims'.
Clearly distinguish between verified facts and allegations.
Use of language that is not neutral and shows a particular bias.
Terms like 'brain blast' and 'big boss' pee' show a lack of neutrality and professionalism.
Use neutral language and maintain a professional tone.
Claims that are made without evidence to support them.
The article discusses 'still-unverified insider claims' about Musk's drug use without providing evidence.
Provide evidence for claims or clarify that they are unverified.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses phrases like 'party hard' and 'billion-dollar question' to evoke an emotional response from the reader.
Avoid language that is designed to evoke an emotional response.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests NASA has responded to allegations about Musk's drug use, but the article provides no substantial evidence from NASA.
Ensure the headline accurately reflects the content of the article.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.