Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article's title and content focus on trivial gossip, suggesting a significant secret was shared to provoke interest.
Reframe the title to reflect the content accurately without suggesting exaggerated importance.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests a significant secret was revealed, which is not substantiated in the article.
Adjust the headline to more accurately reflect the content of the article.
Taking quotes out of their original context to change their meaning.
The article quotes social media speculation and lip-reading without full context, potentially misrepresenting the situation.
Provide the full context of the quotes or clarify that they are speculative.
Language that is partial or prejudiced towards particular views or groups.
The article uses language that portrays the celebrities in a dramatic and negative light, such as 'feuds' and 'eyebrow aggression'.
Use neutral language that does not imply conflict or negativity.
Claims that are not supported by evidence or solid reasoning.
The article makes claims about celebrity relationships and interactions without providing evidence.
Provide evidence for claims or indicate that they are speculative.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article appeals to the reader's interest in celebrity drama and gossip, rather than presenting factual information.
Focus on factual reporting rather than emotional appeal.
Simplifying a complex issue to the point of misrepresentation.
The article simplifies the interactions between celebrities, ignoring the complexity of their relationships and the context of the event.
Acknowledge the complexity of the situation and avoid reducing it to simple narratives.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.