Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Banned Users
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The use of charged and subjective terminology.
Terms like 'lefty', 'billionaires', 'right-wing push', 'bullied', 'purging', 'betraying', 'pathetically ironic', 'edgelord billionaire', 'cunt scumbag', and 'banned reporters' indicate a negative bias against Elon Musk and those associated with him.
Use neutral language to describe individuals and actions, such as 'left-leaning', 'wealthy individuals', 'political campaign', 'pressured', 'removing accounts', 'contradicting', 'controversial figure', 'individual', and 'suspended journalists'.
The use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article's title and content use sensational language like 'bans a bunch of popular lefty accounts' and 'backtracks', which may exaggerate the situation for dramatic effect.
Rephrase to a more neutral tone, such as 'Elon Musk’s Platform Temporarily Suspends Several Accounts, Reinstates Them Later'.
Claims made without evidence to support them.
The article suggests that the suspensions were due to criticism of Musk and Ackman without providing concrete evidence for this claim.
Provide evidence for the claims or clarify that they are speculative, e.g., 'It is speculated that the suspensions may be related to criticism of Musk and Ackman, though no official reason has been provided.'
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
Phrases like 'betraying his self-described “free speech absolutist” principles' and 'that cunt scumbag Elon Musk' are designed to evoke an emotional response rather than present an objective argument.
Focus on factual reporting and avoid language that is intended to provoke an emotional response, e.g., 'contradicting his previously stated support for free speech' and 'the individual in question, Elon Musk'.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.