Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Caleb Williams
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Using subjective and emotionally charged language to describe one side unfavorably.
The use of terms like 'schmuck quarterback', 'moron', and 'idiotic scouts' shows a clear bias against Drake Maye and those who support him.
Use neutral language to describe the players and their abilities.
Attacking the character of a person rather than addressing the substance of their argument or performance.
Referring to general managers who prefer Maye as 'morons' is a personal attack rather than a critique of Maye's abilities.
Focus on the players' performances and skills without resorting to personal attacks.
The use of exciting or shocking stories or language at the expense of accuracy, in order to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article's title and phrases like 'I already want to puncture my eardrums with a ballpoint pen' are sensationalist and designed to provoke a strong emotional response.
Choose a more measured and factual headline and language throughout the article.
Making claims without providing evidence or support for those claims.
The article claims that NFL fans 'inhale the assessment so often, so blindly' without providing evidence for this broad generalization.
Provide evidence or data to support claims about the opinions and behaviors of NFL fans.
Leaving out important details that could change the perception of the reported story.
The article fails to mention any positive aspects of Drake Maye's performance or potential, which could provide a more balanced view.
Include information about Drake Maye's strengths and potential upside.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses phrases like 'pleasuring yourself to that 20-yard out route' to evoke a visceral reaction rather than presenting a logical argument.
Replace emotional appeals with factual comparisons and analysis.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.