Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
China's Foreign Policy
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The use of overly positive language to describe one side's actions without providing a balanced view.
Terms like 'noble goal', 'solid steps', 'significant contributions', 'successful', and 'high-quality development' are used to describe China's actions without presenting any potential downsides or criticisms.
Include a balanced perspective by mentioning challenges, criticisms, or areas of improvement in China's foreign policy.
Leaving out information that is crucial to understanding the full context of the situation.
The article does not mention any international criticisms or controversies surrounding China's foreign policy, such as issues related to human rights, trade tensions, or territorial disputes.
Mention and address international concerns and criticisms related to China's foreign policy.
Presenting one side of an issue without giving equal time to opposing viewpoints.
The article exclusively presents the successes and positive aspects of China's foreign policy without any mention of opposing views or criticisms.
Provide viewpoints from other countries or international bodies that may have differing perspectives on China's foreign policy.
Using the authority of a figure or institution to support a claim without presenting supporting evidence.
The article frequently references the authority of President Xi Jinping and the Communist Party of China without providing evidence for the claims made about the success of their policies.
Support claims with evidence and data, rather than relying solely on the authority of political leaders.
The tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of one's existing beliefs or theories.
The article only includes information that confirms the positive narrative of China's foreign policy, ignoring any evidence that might contradict this view.
Include a range of evidence, including that which may challenge the prevailing narrative of the article.
A situation in which beliefs are amplified or reinforced by communication and repetition inside a closed system.
The article reinforces the positive narrative of China's foreign policy without presenting any external or critical perspectives.
Introduce a diversity of perspectives to break the echo chamber effect.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.