Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Golden Globes
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article's title and content focus on 'awkward' moments, which sensationalizes the events to attract readers.
Reframe the title to focus on memorable moments rather than 'awkward' ones to reduce sensationalism.
Provide a balanced view of the events by including positive moments and achievements.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests a compilation of the most awkward moments but does not provide sufficient context for each incident, potentially misleading readers about the nature of the events.
Ensure the headline accurately reflects the content of the article.
Include more context in the headline to avoid misleading readers.
Leaving out important details that could change the perception of the reported events.
The article omits the context behind the events described, such as the reasons behind the reactions and the outcomes, which could provide a more balanced view.
Include background information and outcomes of the events to provide a fuller picture.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses emotionally charged language, such as 'eternal bachelor' and 'power couple,' to elicit a response from the reader rather than presenting the information objectively.
Use neutral language to describe individuals and events.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.