Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Medical Professionals
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of emotionally charged language and dramatic examples to create a heightened sense of urgency or importance.
The title of the article and the use of phrases like 'gruesome skin infections' and 'oozing with pus' are sensationalist, aiming to evoke a strong emotional response from the reader.
Use a more neutral title, such as 'Health professionals raise concerns over potential risks of vitamin IV drips'.
Describe medical conditions in a clinical and less emotionally charged manner.
The headline suggests a direct causation that is not fully substantiated in the article.
The headline implies that vitamin IV drips are directly causing a growing number of skin infections, which may not be the case for all users and is not conclusively proven in the article.
Rephrase the headline to reflect the potential risks rather than asserting a definitive cause, such as 'Doctors caution against potential skin infection risks from vitamin IV drips'.
The article heavily focuses on the negative aspects of vitamin IV drips without equally presenting the perspective of those who advocate for their benefits.
The majority of the article discusses the risks and negative outcomes associated with vitamin IV drips, with limited input from proponents or discussion of potential benefits.
Include more statements from medical professionals or individuals who have had positive experiences with vitamin IV drips.
Present research or studies that support the use of vitamin IV drips, if available.
Manipulation by using emotional stories or language to persuade the reader, rather than presenting objective facts.
The article uses the personal story of Bea Amma to evoke an emotional response and highlight the dangers of vitamin IV drips.
While personal stories can be relevant, ensure they are used to illustrate a point rather than to manipulate emotions. Balance emotional anecdotes with factual data.
Leaving out important data or perspectives that could change the overall understanding of the topic.
The article does not provide information on the prevalence of positive outcomes or the percentage of treatments that result in complications.
Include statistics on the success rate of vitamin IV drips and the proportion of users who experience benefits without complications.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.