Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The article relies on information from unnamed 'insiders' and 'sources' without providing evidence or verification.
Statements such as 'A source told the National Enquirer' and 'remarked an insider' rely on anonymous sources.
Provide information from named and verifiable sources.
Include statements from the involved parties or their official representatives.
The article uses dramatic language to provoke interest at the expense of accuracy.
Phrases like 'totally blew up' and 'makes Matt nauseous' are sensationalist.
Use neutral language and avoid dramatic descriptions.
The article attempts to manipulate an emotional response instead of presenting information objectively.
The narrative of a 'rift' and descriptions of 'emasculate Ben' are designed to evoke an emotional response.
Stick to factual reporting without attempting to evoke sympathy or other emotions.
The article uses language that suggests a subjective opinion rather than an objective report.
Terms like 'doghouse' and 'arm candy' carry a negative connotation and suggest bias.
Use neutral terms that do not carry implicit judgments.
The article makes claims without providing evidence or clear sources.
Claims about the state of Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez's relationship and Matt Damon's opinions are not substantiated.
Provide evidence or statements from the individuals involved to support the claims.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.