Tesla hides Disney+ from car screens amid Elon Musk’s feud with Bob Iger.

[ 19/12/2023 19:00 ] Read on nypost.com

Report Overview: The article has a score of 60 out of 100, indicating that it contains a moderate amount of manipulations. The manipulations found include sensationalism, biased language, cherry-picking data, omission of key information, and appeal to emotion. These manipulations contribute to a lack of objectivity in the article.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Elon Musk/Tesla (40)

Bob Iger/Disney (80)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Bob Iger/Disney

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Sensationalism

The article uses sensational language to create drama and intrigue.

The article describes the situation as a 'nasty feud' between Elon Musk and Bob Iger, implying a high level of conflict.

Use neutral language to describe the situation without adding unnecessary drama.

Biased language

The article uses biased language that favors one side over the other.

The article refers to Elon Musk as 'CEO' while referring to Bob Iger as 'Disney boss,' which may imply a power imbalance.

Use neutral language to refer to both Elon Musk and Bob Iger to avoid favoring one side over the other.

Cherry-picking data

The article selectively presents information to support a particular narrative.

The article highlights the removal of the Disney+ app from Tesla vehicles without providing the full context or explanation behind the decision.

Provide a more comprehensive explanation of the decision to remove the Disney+ app from Tesla vehicles to give readers a better understanding of the situation.

Omission of key information

The article leaves out important details that could provide a more balanced perspective.

The article does not include any comments or statements from Tesla or Disney, leaving readers with only one side of the story.

Include statements or comments from both Tesla and Disney to provide a more balanced perspective.

Appeal to emotion

The article uses emotional language to evoke sympathy or outrage.

The article includes quotes from Tesla owners expressing their frustration and disappointment about the removal of the Disney+ app.

Present the information in a more neutral tone without relying on emotional language.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.