Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Congress
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that is intended to provoke strong emotions or interest
The article uses sensationalism by emphasizing that Hunter Biden defied a congressional subpoena and then went shopping with his father, President Biden. This framing is intended to create a negative perception of Hunter Biden's actions.
Present the information in a neutral and objective manner without using sensational language.
Provide more context about the reasons behind Hunter Biden's decision to defy the subpoena.
Using a headline that does not accurately reflect the content of the article
The headline suggests that Hunter Biden went shopping with Joe Biden immediately after defying a congressional subpoena, creating the impression of disregard for the law. However, the article itself mentions that the shopping trip occurred days after the subpoena.
Use a headline that accurately reflects the timeline of events.
Avoid using misleading language that can create a false impression.
Selectively choosing data or evidence that supports a particular viewpoint
The article selectively focuses on Hunter Biden's actions and the criticism he has faced, while downplaying or omitting information that could provide a more balanced perspective.
Include a more comprehensive analysis of the events and perspectives involved.
Present a range of viewpoints and evidence to provide a more balanced representation.
Leaving out important details that could significantly impact the interpretation of the information
The article omits key information about the reasons behind Hunter Biden's decision to defy the congressional subpoena and the ongoing investigation into the Biden family's business dealings.
Include relevant context and information to provide a more complete picture of the situation.
Avoid omitting important details that could impact the interpretation of the events.
Using language that favors one side or viewpoint over others
The article uses biased language by referring to Hunter Biden as the 'embattled son' and emphasizing the criticism and calls for contempt of Congress against him. This language creates a negative perception of Hunter Biden.
Use neutral and objective language to describe the individuals and events involved.
Avoid using language that can create a biased or negative perception.
Presenting information in a way that favors one side or viewpoint over others
The article focuses primarily on Hunter Biden's actions and the criticism he has faced, while providing limited information about the perspective of the Biden family or the reasons behind their actions.
Include a more balanced representation of the different perspectives and viewpoints involved.
Provide a more comprehensive analysis of the events and the motivations behind the actions.
Using sources that support a particular viewpoint while ignoring or downplaying conflicting sources
The article relies heavily on statements from Republican lawmakers and critics of Hunter Biden, while providing limited information or perspectives from other sources.
Include a wider range of sources to provide a more comprehensive and balanced representation of the events.
Avoid relying solely on sources that support a particular viewpoint.
Making statements or claims without providing sufficient evidence or support
The article includes statements from Republican lawmakers accusing Hunter Biden of defying lawful subpoenas and making claims about Joe Biden's involvement in his family's business dealings without providing sufficient evidence to support these claims.
Provide more evidence or supporting information to substantiate the claims made in the article.
Avoid making unsupported claims or statements without sufficient evidence.
Using the opinion or endorsement of an authority figure to support a claim or argument
The article includes statements from Republican lawmakers and critics of Hunter Biden, presenting their opinions as authoritative and using them to support the claims made in the article.
Provide a more balanced representation of different perspectives and avoid relying solely on the opinions of authority figures.
Include evidence and supporting information to strengthen the arguments made in the article.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.