Patriots' Matthew Judon takes swipe at NFL officials' treatment of Patrick Mahomes.

[ 17/12/2023 23:46 ] Read on foxnews.com

Report Overview: The article has a score of 70, indicating that it is somewhat objective but contains some manipulations. The sidesScore shows that the presentation of the Patriots side is more objective (score of 90) compared to the Chiefs side (score of 40). The sidesBalance indicates that the Patriots side is favored in the article with a balance of 78%.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Patriots (90)

Chiefs (40)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Patriots

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Misleading headlines

The headline suggests that Matthew Judon took a swipe at NFL officials' treatment of Patrick Mahomes, but the content of the article does not provide strong evidence of this.

The headline implies that Matthew Judon directly criticized the treatment of Patrick Mahomes by NFL officials, but the article does not provide any direct quotes or evidence of this. It only mentions Judon's comment on a post showing an AI-generated image of Mahomes and an official kissing.

Change the headline to accurately reflect the content of the article.

Cherry-picking data

The article selectively focuses on instances where the Kansas City Chiefs benefited from penalty flags, but does not provide a balanced view of the game.

The article highlights a defensive holding penalty that negated a Chiefs fumble and recovery by the Patriots, leading to a field goal for the Chiefs. However, it does not mention any instances where the Patriots benefited from penalty flags or provide a balanced view of the game.

Include information about instances where the Patriots benefited from penalty flags to provide a balanced view of the game.

Unbalanced reporting

The article presents the Patriots side more objectively (score of 90) compared to the Chiefs side (score of 40).

The article focuses more on the Patriots' perspective, including comments from Matthew Judon and mentioning the fines imposed on Patrick Mahomes and Andy Reid. It does not provide a balanced representation of the Chiefs' perspective.

Include quotes or comments from Chiefs players or coaches to provide a more balanced representation of their perspective.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.