Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that is intended to provoke strong emotions or interest.
The article uses sensational language and focuses on salacious details to grab attention.
Present the information in a more neutral and objective manner without using sensational language.
Using headlines that are intentionally misleading or sensationalized to attract readers.
The headline of the article is misleading and focuses on salacious details rather than the actual content of the indictment.
Use a more accurate and objective headline that reflects the content of the article.
Selectively choosing data or information that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring contradictory data.
The article selectively focuses on the salacious details of the indictment while ignoring other important information.
Provide a more balanced and comprehensive overview of the indictment, including all relevant information.
Using language that is intentionally slanted or biased to favor a particular viewpoint.
The article uses biased language to describe Hunter Biden's alleged actions, such as 'salacious' and 'exotic dancers'.
Use neutral and objective language to describe the events and actions mentioned in the article.
Presenting information in a way that favors one side or viewpoint over others.
The article focuses solely on the negative aspects of Hunter Biden's alleged actions without providing any context or counterarguments.
Provide a more balanced and fair representation of the events and actions mentioned in the article.
Using the opinion or endorsement of an authority figure to support a particular viewpoint.
The article includes quotes from George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley to support the claim that President Biden has lied about the Hunter Biden case.
Provide a more diverse range of perspectives and opinions to ensure a balanced representation of the issue.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.