Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Robert De Niro
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that provokes strong emotions or excitement.
The article uses sensationalism by emphasizing the drama surrounding Robert De Niro's speech being edited without his permission.
Present the information about Robert De Niro's speech being edited without sensationalizing it.
Provide a more balanced perspective on the drama surrounding the speech.
Using headlines that misrepresent the content of the article.
The headline 'Past Lives,' Lily Gladstone win at Gotham Awards, while Robert De Niro says his speech was edited' suggests that Lily Gladstone's win is directly related to Robert De Niro's speech being edited, which may not be the case.
Use a more accurate headline that reflects the content of the article without misleading the readers.
Leaving out important details that could provide a more complete understanding of the topic.
The article omits information about the other winners and nominees at the Gotham Awards, focusing primarily on Robert De Niro and Lily Gladstone.
Include information about the other winners and nominees to provide a more comprehensive view of the Gotham Awards.
Using language that favors one side or perspective over others.
The article uses biased language by describing Robert De Niro's speech as 'fiery rhetoric' and 'blaming' Apple for the changes to his speech.
Use neutral language to describe Robert De Niro's speech and the situation with Apple.
Avoid assigning blame without sufficient evidence.
Presenting information in a way that favors one side or perspective over others.
The article focuses more on Robert De Niro and Lily Gladstone, giving them more positive coverage compared to other aspects of the Gotham Awards.
Provide more balanced coverage of the Gotham Awards, giving equal attention to all winners and nominees.
Presenting two sides as equal or equivalent when they are not.
The article falsely equates the drama surrounding Robert De Niro's speech being edited with Lily Gladstone's win at the Gotham Awards.
Avoid making false equivalences between unrelated events or situations.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.