Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that is intended to provoke excitement, shock, or interest.
The article uses sensational language to describe Rankin's desire to photograph Ed Sheeran, stating that he's 'dying' to work with him and that Ed Sheeran has 'never had a good one' when it comes to photographs.
Use more neutral language to describe Rankin's interest in photographing Ed Sheeran.
Avoid making subjective statements about the quality of Ed Sheeran's previous photographs.
Selectively choosing data or evidence that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring contradictory data or evidence.
The article mentions Rankin's extensive list of celebrity contacts and the notable names he has photographed, but it fails to provide any information about Ed Sheeran's perspective or whether he is interested in being photographed by Rankin.
Include information about Ed Sheeran's perspective on being photographed by Rankin to provide a more balanced view.
Leaving out important details or facts that could significantly impact the interpretation of the article.
The article mentions Rankin's desire to photograph Ed Sheeran but does not provide any context or explanation for why Rankin believes Ed Sheeran has 'never had a good one' when it comes to photographs.
Include the reasons or criteria that Rankin uses to determine whether a photograph is 'good' or not.
Provide examples or evidence to support the claim that Ed Sheeran has not had a good photograph taken of him.
Using language that favors one side or viewpoint over others.
The article uses biased language to describe Rankin's career as 'glowing' and 'name-drop king', which may create a positive bias towards him.
Use more neutral language to describe Rankin's career and achievements.
Avoid using language that may create a positive bias towards Rankin.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.