Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Prince William
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that is intended to provoke interest, excitement, or shock.
The article uses sensational language such as 'explosive memoir' and 'physically assaulting' to create drama and capture attention.
Use neutral language to present the information without exaggeration.
Using headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests that Prince William has definitively closed his mind to a reconciliation with Prince Harry, but the article only quotes a royal expert's opinion.
Use a headline that accurately reflects the content of the article.
Selectively choosing data or information that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring contradictory data.
The article selectively focuses on negative aspects of the relationship between Prince William and Prince Harry, such as the accusation of physical assault, without providing a balanced view of their relationship.
Provide a more balanced view of the relationship between Prince William and Prince Harry by including positive aspects as well.
Using language that favors one side or viewpoint over another.
The article uses language that portrays Prince William in a more positive light, such as 'moved on with his life' and 'enjoying great popularity and a wonderfully happy home life', while portraying Prince Harry in a more negative light, such as 'critical' and 'rift'.
Use neutral language that does not favor one side over the other.
Presenting information in a way that favors one side or viewpoint over another.
The article primarily focuses on the perspective of a royal expert who dismisses the idea of reconciliation and emphasizes Prince William's perspective, while not providing a balanced view of Prince Harry's perspective.
Include perspectives from both Prince William and Prince Harry to provide a more balanced view.
Using the opinion or endorsement of an authority figure to support a claim or viewpoint.
The article relies heavily on the opinion of a royal expert to support its claims about Prince William's mindset and the potential for reconciliation.
Provide a variety of expert opinions or include direct quotes from Prince William and Prince Harry to support the claims.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.