Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Michelle Obama
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The article uses sensational language to grab attention and evoke strong emotions.
The article states that the 'devaluation of women' is behind the changes to reproductive rights in the US. This statement is presented in a sensational manner, emphasizing the negative impact on women's rights.
Present the information in a more neutral and objective tone, avoiding sensational language.
The article selectively presents information that supports a particular viewpoint.
The article mentions the rollback of reproductive rights in some US states but does not provide a balanced view of the reasons behind these changes or the arguments made by those who support them.
Provide a more comprehensive analysis of the reasons behind the changes to reproductive rights, including perspectives from both sides of the debate.
The article uses language that favors a particular viewpoint.
The article refers to Michelle Obama as a 'human rights campaigner' and Amal Clooney as a 'high-profile barrister', which may imply a positive bias towards their perspectives.
Use neutral language when referring to individuals or groups involved in the discussion.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.