Streamer Feud Takes a New Turn: xQc Reacts to Pokimane’s Dig.

[ 25/11/2023 12:30 ] Read on citylife.capetown

Report Overview: The article has a score of 70 out of 100, indicating that it is moderately objective. While there are some manipulations present, they do not significantly outweigh the objective statements in the article.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Pokimane

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Biased language

The use of biased language favors one side over the other.

The article uses biased language when describing the feud, stating that xQc 'reacted strongly' and that it was 'clear who she was referring to.' This language implies that xQc's reaction was excessive and that Pokimane's dig was intentional.

Use neutral language to describe the reactions of both streamers.

Avoid making assumptions about the intentions behind Pokimane's statements.

Cherry-picking data

Selective use of information to support a particular narrative.

The article selectively mentions xQc's positive financial outcome from the gambling ban, but does not provide any counterarguments or perspectives.

Include a balanced discussion of the impact of the gambling ban on both streamers.

Present multiple perspectives on the financial outcomes of the ban.

Unsubstantiated claims

Statements made without sufficient evidence or support.

The article mentions that xQc believes another streamer, Sliker, was the main catalyst behind Twitch banning gambling content, but does not provide any evidence to support this claim.

Include evidence or sources to support xQc's claim about Sliker's influence on the gambling ban.

Present alternative perspectives on the reasons behind Twitch's decision to ban gambling content.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.