Ron DeSantis Donors Are Growing Frustrated With His Cratering Campaign, With One Comparing It To ‘Throwing Money At RadioShack’.

[ 21/11/2023 23:49 ] Read on uproxx.com

Report Overview: The article contains a mix of objective statements and manipulations. Some manipulations include biased language, ad hominem attacks, and sensationalism. The article also cherry-picks data by focusing on negative aspects of Ron DeSantis' campaign without providing a balanced view. The score of 50 indicates that half of the statements in the article contain manipulations.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Ron DeSantis (40)

Supporters (60)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Supporters

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Biased language

The article uses biased language to portray Ron DeSantis in a negative light.

It must be humiliating to be losing so badly to someone who’s . But that’s what’s happening to Ron DeSantis. This time last year, some six months before he’d even formally launched his 2024 campaign, the Florida governor was the next great, very white hope for the Republican Party, while Donald Trump had turned into Sideshow Bob stepping on rakes.

Use neutral language to describe the situation without adding personal opinions or biases.

Ad hominem attacks

The article includes ad hominem attacks against Ron DeSantis and his supporters.

A recent meeting descended into petty in-fighting. Instead of hashing out a plan to save their guy, members almost came to blows between the PAC’s top consultant, Jeff Roe, and longtime DeSantis confidant Scott Wagner. “You have a stick up your a*s, Scott,” Roe told Wagner during a budget discussion. “Why don’t you come over here and get it?” Wagner replied.

Avoid personal attacks and focus on the issues and policies instead.

Sensationalism

The article uses sensational language to create a negative perception of Ron DeSantis' campaign.

Their fortunes have flipped, and DeSantis’ supporters are starting to have buyers’ remorse. In a bit , NBC News has a on what’s up with Never Back Down, the DeSantis super PAC that’s stuck by his side, even as he’s been felled by and .

Use neutral language and provide evidence or data to support claims instead of relying on sensational language.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.