Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Makers
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that is intended to provoke excitement, shock, or interest.
The article uses sensationalism by stating that there might be a mass elimination in the coming days, without providing any evidence or official confirmation.
Provide evidence or official confirmation for the claim of a mass elimination.
Using headlines that are intentionally misleading or clickbait to attract attention.
The headline suggests that Elvish Yadav dropped hints on a wildcard, but the article does not provide any direct quotes or clear information from Elvish Yadav.
Use a headline that accurately reflects the content of the article.
Selectively choosing data or information that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring contradictory data or information.
The article selectively mentions the names of potential wildcards without providing a balanced view or considering other possibilities.
Provide a balanced view by considering all potential wildcards and their likelihood of joining the show.
Leaving out important information that could provide a more complete or balanced understanding of the topic.
The article mentions the arrival of five new wildcards but does not provide any information about the current contestants or the overall format of the show.
Include information about the current contestants and the overall format of the show to provide a more complete understanding.
Using language that favors one side or viewpoint over others.
The article uses biased language by referring to Lovekesh Kataria as Elvish Yadav's 'good friend' without providing any evidence of their friendship.
Avoid using biased language and provide evidence or context to support claims.
Presenting information in a way that favors one side or viewpoint over others, without providing a fair representation of different perspectives.
The article focuses more on the speculation and opinions of fans, while not providing enough information or perspectives from the makers of the show.
Include perspectives from the makers of the show to provide a more balanced representation of different viewpoints.
Using sources that support a particular viewpoint while ignoring or downplaying sources that provide a different perspective.
The article relies heavily on social media reports and fan speculation, without providing any official statements or reliable sources from the makers of the show.
Include official statements or reliable sources from the makers of the show to provide a more balanced and credible perspective.
Making claims without providing evidence or supporting information.
The article makes claims about the arrival of five new wildcards and the potential inclusion of Mr. Faisu on the show without providing any evidence or official confirmation.
Provide evidence or official confirmation for the claims made in the article.
Using the opinion or endorsement of an authority figure to support a claim or viewpoint.
The article mentions that Mr. Faisu is one of the biggest TikTok stars of India and the runners-up of Khatron Ke Khiladi 12, implying that his inclusion on Bigg Boss 17 would be desirable.
Avoid relying solely on the opinion or endorsement of an authority figure and provide a more balanced perspective.
Drawing an equivalence between two things that are not truly equivalent.
The article falsely equates the potential inclusion of Mr. Faisu on Bigg Boss 17 with his previous participation in Khatron Ke Khiladi 12, suggesting that his inclusion would be equally successful.
Avoid drawing false equivalences and provide a more accurate representation of the potential impact of Mr. Faisu's inclusion on Bigg Boss 17.
Interpreting or seeking out information in a way that confirms pre-existing beliefs or biases.
The article selectively mentions positive aspects of Mr. Faisu's social media presence and popularity without considering any potential negative aspects or criticisms.
Consider and present a more balanced view of Mr. Faisu's social media presence and popularity, including potential negative aspects or criticisms.
Presenting facts in a way that is misleading or inaccurate.
The article presents the speculation and opinions of fans as if they are facts, without providing any evidence or official confirmation.
Clearly distinguish between speculation/opinions and facts, and provide evidence or official confirmation for any claims made.
Presenting a complex issue or topic in a simplified or overly general way.
The article oversimplifies the potential inclusion of Mr. Faisu on Bigg Boss 17 by focusing solely on his social media popularity and entertainment quotient.
Provide a more nuanced and comprehensive analysis of the potential inclusion of Mr. Faisu on Bigg Boss 17, considering various factors and perspectives.
Relying on immediate examples or information that comes to mind easily when making judgments or decisions.
The article relies on the availability heuristic by mentioning the popularity and reach of social media stars like Elvish Yadav and Mr. Faisu without considering other factors that contribute to their success.
Consider and present a more comprehensive analysis of the factors that contribute to the popularity and success of social media stars.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.