Greenpeace astonished at Kim Kardashian’s nipple bra making ‘mockery’ of climate change.

[ 19/11/2023 16:29 ] Read on metro.co.uk

Report Overview: The article contains several manipulations such as sensationalism, misleading headlines, biased language, and omission of key information. These manipulations contribute to a lack of objectivity in the article.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Kim Kardashian (40)

Greenpeace (80)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Greenpeace

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Sensationalism

The article uses sensational language to grab attention and create a dramatic effect.

Kim Kardashian raised eyebrows when she launched her nipple bra but Greenpeace has hit back at her ‘greenwashing’ Skims campaign.

Use neutral language to present the information without exaggeration.

Misleading headlines

The headline of the article is misleading and does not accurately represent the content of the article.

Greenpeace astonished at Kim Kardashian’s nipple bra making ‘mockery’ of climate change

Use a more accurate and objective headline that reflects the content of the article.

Biased language

The article uses biased language to present a negative view of Kim Kardashian and a positive view of Greenpeace.

Kim has already been called out for setting a new unattainable beauty standard for women but Greenpeace took issue with her ‘mockery’ of the climate crisis.

Use neutral language to present both sides without bias.

Omission of key information

The article omits key information about the Skims campaign and the donation made by Skims to environmental organizations.

The bra is made from nylon, a thermoplastic, and spandex uses a plastic base, which means the bra will not be able to biodegrade should it be thrown away. Skims did promise to donate 10% of sales in a one-time donation, to 1 Percent For The Planet, a global network that helps business connect with environmental organisations.

Include more information about the Skims campaign and the donation made by Skims to provide a more balanced view.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.