Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Joe Biden
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The article uses sensational language to evoke strong emotions and create a dramatic effect.
When US President Joe Biden said Hamas had “unleashed pure, unadulterated evil in the world”
Use neutral language to describe the statement without exaggeration.
The article selectively chooses information that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring contradictory evidence.
Several Israeli figures have called October 7 the country’s 9/11 moment, a disturbingly apt description.
Provide a more balanced perspective by including other viewpoints and opinions.
The article uses language that shows a clear bias towards a particular side or viewpoint.
Politicians and analysts argue for Israel’s “right to defend itself”, even when it is in clear violation of international law.
Use neutral language to describe the arguments without favoring one side over the other.
The article presents information in a way that favors one side over the other, without providing a fair representation of different perspectives.
This “us vs them” framing permeates the way people speak to each other online, at work and in classrooms, further dividing us while a of untold proportions continues to unfold.
Include a more diverse range of perspectives to provide a balanced view of the situation.
The article uses emotional language and anecdotes to manipulate the reader's feelings and create a biased perception.
After being sold an unjust war only 20 years ago, I would have thought that we’d be better at recognizing a political and economic agenda operating under the guise of “self-defense”
Use more objective language and rely on factual evidence to support arguments.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.