Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Donald Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that is intended to provoke interest, excitement, or shock.
The article uses sensationalism in the headline by calling Kim Kardashian the 'world's most overrated celebrity' and touting Kanye West. This sensationalized language is used to grab attention and create controversy.
Change the headline to a more neutral and informative statement.
Using a headline that does not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests that Donald Trump is criticizing Kim Kardashian while supporting Kanye West, but the article itself focuses more on the claims made by a journalist and the alleged actions of Kim Kardashian. The headline is misleading because it implies a direct criticism from Trump that is not fully supported by the article.
Use a headline that accurately reflects the content of the article.
Selectively choosing data or evidence that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring contradictory data or evidence.
The article selectively presents information about Kim Kardashian's alleged actions and Donald Trump's response, without providing a balanced view of the situation. It focuses on negative aspects of Kardashian's actions and Trump's criticism, while downplaying any positive aspects or counterarguments.
Provide a more balanced presentation of the information, including different perspectives and counterarguments.
Using language that favors one side or viewpoint over another.
The article uses biased language by referring to Kim Kardashian as the 'world's most overrated celebrity' and calling her actions 'failed'. This language is subjective and presents a negative view of Kardashian.
Use neutral language that does not favor one side or viewpoint over another.
Presenting information in a way that favors one side or viewpoint over another.
The article focuses more on the claims made by a journalist and the alleged actions of Kim Kardashian, while downplaying any positive aspects or counterarguments. It does not provide a balanced view of the situation.
Include different perspectives and counterarguments to provide a more balanced view of the situation.
Presenting two sides or viewpoints as equal or equivalent when they are not.
The article suggests a false equivalence between the actions of Kim Kardashian and the response of Donald Trump. It implies that both sides are equally responsible for the alleged actions and their consequences, without considering the context or the extent of their involvement.
Avoid presenting a false equivalence by providing a more nuanced analysis of the actions and their consequences.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.