Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that is intended to provoke excitement, shock, or interest.
The article uses sensationalism by claiming that Nicolle Wallace and Jonathan Karl are discussing Donald Trump's affinity for Hitler, which is a highly provocative and attention-grabbing statement.
Present the discussion in a more neutral and objective manner without using sensational language.
Using headlines that are intentionally misleading or sensationalized to attract attention.
The article's title suggests that Nicolle Wallace and Jonathan Karl are discussing Donald Trump's affinity for Hitler, but the content of the article does not provide any substantial evidence or discussion on this topic.
Use a more accurate and informative headline that reflects the actual content of the article.
Using language that favors one side or perspective over another.
The article contains biased language such as referring to Nicolle Wallace and Jonathan Karl as 'DNC shills' and 'hacks', which undermines their credibility and portrays them in a negative light.
Use neutral and respectful language when referring to individuals or groups.
Selectively choosing data or information that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring contradictory evidence.
The article cherry-picks statements made by Nicolle Wallace and Jonathan Karl that suggest a connection between Donald Trump and Hitler, while ignoring any other context or discussion that may provide a more balanced perspective.
Include a broader range of statements and perspectives to provide a more comprehensive and balanced view of the discussion.
Presenting information in a way that favors one side or perspective over another, without providing a fair representation of all relevant viewpoints.
The article focuses solely on statements that suggest a connection between Donald Trump and Hitler, without providing any counterarguments or alternative perspectives.
Include a variety of viewpoints and counterarguments to provide a more balanced and comprehensive report.
Drawing an equal comparison between two things that are not actually equivalent.
The article falsely equates Nicolle Wallace and Jonathan Karl's discussion of Donald Trump's affinity for Hitler with the idea that the left is crafting a narrative about Trump being akin to Adolf Hitler.
Avoid making false equivalences and provide accurate and fair comparisons.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.