Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Israel
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The article uses sensational language to create a sense of urgency and drama.
The article uses phrases like 'sounding the alarm,' 'deep rifts,' 'massive crowds,' and 'overwhelmed with a deluge' to create a sense of urgency and drama around the Israel-Gaza conflict.
Use neutral language to describe the situation without exaggeration.
The article's headline suggests that Joe Biden could lose support in 2024 over the Israel-Gaza conflict, which may not be supported by the content of the article.
The article discusses the growing divide within the Democratic Party regarding the Israel-Gaza conflict, but it does not provide evidence or quotes suggesting that Joe Biden could lose support in 2024 specifically because of this issue.
Use a headline that accurately reflects the content of the article.
The article uses biased language that favors certain perspectives or portrays them in a negative light.
The article uses phrases like 'siege,' 'unifying around calls for a ceasefire,' 'supportive of Israel’s military campaign,' 'left-leaning spaces,' 'overwhelmed with a deluge of constituent calls,' and 'rendered the Al-Shifa hospital nonfunctional' to portray certain perspectives in a negative light or create a negative impression.
Use neutral language that presents different perspectives without favoring any particular side.
The article omits key information that could provide a more balanced and comprehensive understanding of the Israel-Gaza conflict.
The article does not provide information about the reasons behind Israel's military campaign against Hamas or the context of the conflict. It also does not include perspectives from those who support Israel's actions or provide a comprehensive analysis of the situation.
Include relevant information about the reasons behind Israel's military campaign and provide a more comprehensive analysis of the conflict.
The article presents a one-sided view of the Israel-Gaza conflict, focusing primarily on progressive criticism of Israel's actions.
The article heavily focuses on progressive criticism of Israel's military campaign against Hamas and does not provide a balanced representation of different perspectives within the Democratic Party or the broader political landscape.
Include perspectives from different sides of the political spectrum and provide a more balanced representation of the Israel-Gaza conflict.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.