Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Marilyn Monroe
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting the controversy in an exaggerated or attention-grabbing manner.
The article uses sensational language such as 'intense scrutiny' and 'ripping off' to describe the accusations against Kim Kardashian.
Use neutral language to describe the controversy.
Using a headline that misrepresents the content of the article.
The headline accuses Kim Kardashian of 'copying' Marilyn Monroe's dress, which implies intentional plagiarism.
Use a more neutral headline that accurately reflects the content of the article.
Selectively choosing data or information that supports a particular viewpoint.
The article selectively quotes fans who express disappointment and accuse Kim Kardashian of copying Marilyn Monroe's dress.
Include a balanced representation of fan opinions, including those who support Kim Kardashian's fashion choices.
Using language that favors one side or presents a subjective viewpoint.
The article uses biased language such as 'disappointment,' 'ugly,' and 'awful' to describe the dress and fabric.
Use neutral language to describe the dress and fabric.
Presenting information in a way that favors one side over another.
The article focuses primarily on the criticisms and negative reception of Kim Kardashian's dress, without providing a balanced perspective.
Include a balanced representation of both positive and negative opinions about the dress.
Using sources that support a particular viewpoint while ignoring others.
The article only references fans expressing disappointment and potential legal action, without including any sources that support Kim Kardashian's perspective.
Include sources that provide a balanced representation of different perspectives on the controversy.
Using the opinion or endorsement of an authority figure to support a claim.
The article mentions fans discussing the controversy on Reddit and refers to a Vogue article, implying that these sources validate the accusations against Kim Kardashian.
Avoid relying solely on the opinions of fans or articles from specific publications as evidence.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.