Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Fans
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that is intended to provoke interest, excitement, or shock.
Viewers are questioning the legitimacy of the money xQc is gambling with, on a site run by the owners of the streaming platform itself.
Present the information in a more neutral tone without exaggeration or sensationalism.
Using headlines that are intentionally deceptive or do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
xQc has gambled over £2 billion but some fans think it’s fake
Use a more accurate and neutral headline that reflects the content of the article.
Selectively choosing data that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring contradictory data.
During a recent stream xQc had a look at his statistics page on gambling site Stake, which revealed he’s wagered £2.15 billion from 887,870 bets. It also shows that from those 887,870 bets he’s won about 10% of them (87,979) and lost 786,709.
Provide a more comprehensive analysis of xQc's gambling statistics, including both wins and losses, to present a more balanced view.
Leaving out important details or facts that may significantly impact the interpretation of the article.
It’s important to say that xQc, like a lot of streamers who gamble, has a deal with the site he plays on. And the site in question here, Stake, is owned by two Kick co-owners, which is the platform xQc often streams on.
Include information about xQc's deal with the gambling site and the ownership relationship between Stake and Kick to provide a more complete picture.
Using language that favors one side or viewpoint over another.
That requires a lot of money but there’s no doubt that the variety streamer has plenty to spend.
Use neutral language that does not imply a bias towards xQc's financial situation.
Presenting information in a way that disproportionately favors one side or viewpoint.
As such, fans have speculated as to the legitimacy of the money he spends, and loses, on the site, suggesting that it’s not real money.
Include perspectives from both fans and xQc to provide a more balanced view of the speculation about the legitimacy of the money.
Making statements without providing evidence or supporting sources.
It could be that xQc doesn’t lose much, or anything, if the deal with the gambling site is lucrative enough.
Avoid making speculative claims without supporting evidence or sources.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.