Donald Trump’s Contentious Day on the Witness Stand.

[ 07/11/2023 01:01 ] Read on newyorker.com

Report Overview: The article contains several manipulations such as biased language, cherry-picking data, omission of key information, and unbalanced reporting. These manipulations contribute to a lack of objectivity in the article.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Donald Trump (40)

Prosecution (80)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Prosecution

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Biased language

The article uses biased language to favor one side over the other.

The article refers to Donald Trump as 'hefty' and 'unnaturally tanned,' which is unnecessary and adds a negative connotation to his appearance.

Use neutral language to describe Donald Trump's appearance.

Cherry-picking data

The article selectively presents data that supports a particular narrative.

The article mentions an expert witness testifying that the inflated valuation statements helped the Trump Organization save about a hundred seventy million dollars in interest costs, but fails to provide any counterarguments or alternative perspectives.

Include counterarguments or alternative perspectives to provide a more balanced view of the situation.

Omission of key information

The article leaves out important details that could provide a more complete understanding of the situation.

The article mentions that Trump complained about prosecutors being 'all Democrats, all Trump haters,' but does not provide any context or evidence to support or refute this claim.

Provide context or evidence to support or refute Trump's claim about the political affiliations of the prosecutors.

Unbalanced reporting

The article presents one side of the story more favorably or extensively than the other.

The article includes more quotes and details from the prosecution's perspective, while providing less information from Donald Trump's perspective.

Include more quotes and details from Donald Trump's perspective to provide a more balanced view of the situation.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.