Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Obama
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that is intended to provoke strong emotions or interest.
The article uses sensational language to describe the chaos on social media during the Israel-Hamas war.
Use neutral language to describe the situation on social media.
Using a headline that does not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests that Obama is against 'TikTok activism' in general, but the article clarifies that he is specifically discouraging it in the context of the Israel-Hamas war.
Use a more accurate headline that reflects the specific context of Obama's remarks.
Selectively choosing data or information that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring contradictory data or information.
The article selectively quotes Obama's remarks about the Israel-Hamas war, focusing on his criticism of 'TikTok activism' and not providing a balanced representation of his full statement.
Include the full context of Obama's remarks to provide a more balanced representation of his views.
Leaving out important information that is necessary for a complete understanding of the topic.
The article does not provide any information about the actions of Hamas or the reasons behind the Israel-Hamas war, which is important context for understanding Obama's remarks.
Include information about the actions of Hamas and the reasons behind the Israel-Hamas war to provide necessary context.
Using language that favors one side or viewpoint over another.
The article uses language that portrays social media as a 'chaos agent' and criticizes 'TikTok activism,' which suggests a bias against social media advocacy.
Use neutral language to describe social media and avoid expressing a bias against 'TikTok activism.'
Presenting information in a way that favors one side or viewpoint over another.
The article focuses primarily on Obama's criticism of 'TikTok activism' and does not provide a balanced representation of different perspectives on the Israel-Hamas war.
Include a more balanced representation of different perspectives on the Israel-Hamas war.
Using the opinion or endorsement of a respected figure to support a claim or argument.
The article highlights Obama's remarks about the Israel-Hamas war, suggesting that his opinion carries weight and should be considered authoritative.
Provide a range of perspectives on the Israel-Hamas war, rather than relying solely on the opinion of one individual.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.