Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Pokimane
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that is intended to provoke strong emotions or interest
The article uses sensationalism by stating that xQc's actions have cost him friendships and that he has been involved in controversies over the years. This creates a negative perception of xQc and adds drama to the situation.
Present the information in a more neutral and objective manner without exaggerating the impact of xQc's actions.
Using headlines that are intentionally vague or misleading to attract attention
The headline suggests that xQc reveals Pokimane unfollowed him and admits he didn't 'maintain' friendship, but the article itself reveals that xQc understands his own mistakes and doesn't blame Pokimane for her actions.
Use a more accurate and informative headline that reflects the content of the article.
Selectively choosing data or information that supports a particular viewpoint
The article selectively focuses on xQc's controversial actions and his loss of friendship with Pokimane, while ignoring any positive aspects of their relationship or xQc's perspective on the situation.
Provide a more balanced representation of the situation by including relevant information from both xQc and Pokimane's perspectives.
Using language that favors one side or viewpoint over another
The article uses biased language by describing xQc's actions as 'antics' and referring to his controversial Twitter response as 'f****** stupid.' This creates a negative perception of xQc and influences the reader's opinion.
Use neutral and objective language to describe the events and actions without adding personal bias.
Presenting information in a way that favors one side or viewpoint over another
The article focuses more on xQc's perspective and his understanding of his own mistakes, while only briefly mentioning Pokimane's actions and not providing her perspective on the situation.
Provide a more balanced representation of the situation by including relevant information from both xQc and Pokimane's perspectives.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.