Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that is intended to provoke strong emotions or reactions.
The article uses sensational language such as 'Attack on Israel Wouldn't Hold a Candle to This' in the title to grab attention and create a sense of urgency.
Change the title to a more neutral and informative one.
Using headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests that the Special Forces veteran warns Joe Rogan about a crisis that is worse than an attack on Israel, but the article does not provide evidence to support this claim.
Use a headline that accurately reflects the content of the article.
Selectively choosing data or information that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring contradictory data or information.
The article selectively focuses on the Special Forces veteran's warning about potential terrorist attacks at the southern border, without providing a balanced perspective or considering other factors.
Provide a more balanced perspective by including other viewpoints or considering additional factors.
Leaving out important information that may provide a more complete or balanced understanding of the topic.
The article does not provide any information or evidence to support the claim that the crisis on the southern border would be worse than the Oct. 7 Hamas massacre in Israel.
Include evidence or information to support the claim made in the article.
Using language that favors one side or viewpoint over others.
The article uses language such as 'catastrophic administration' to express a negative bias towards President Joe Biden.
Use neutral language that does not express a bias towards any particular side or viewpoint.
Presenting information in a way that favors one side or viewpoint over others.
The article primarily focuses on the Special Forces veteran's warning about potential terrorist attacks at the southern border, without providing a balanced perspective or considering other factors.
Include other perspectives or viewpoints to provide a more balanced report.
Using emotional language or appeals to manipulate the audience's feelings or reactions.
The article uses language such as 'It’ll scare the crap out of you' to evoke fear and create a sense of urgency.
Use neutral language that does not rely on emotional appeals.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.