Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Matthew Perry
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that is intended to provoke strong emotions or interest
The article uses sensationalism by emphasizing Perry's struggles with addiction and his bitter feud with Keanu Reeves, which may attract attention but does not contribute to a balanced and objective portrayal of the situation.
Focus on the achievements and contributions of both Matthew Perry and Keanu Reeves rather than emphasizing their personal struggles and feud.
Selectively choosing data or information that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring contradictory data
The article cherry-picks data by highlighting Perry's resentment towards Reeves after losing friends to substance abuse, without providing a broader context or considering other factors that may have contributed to their tragic fates.
Provide a more comprehensive analysis of the factors that contribute to addiction and tragic outcomes, without solely attributing them to Reeves' success.
Leaving out important details or context that may significantly impact the interpretation of the information
The article omits key information about the nature of Perry's feud with Reeves, such as the lack of personal relationship or professional collaboration between them.
Include additional information to provide a more complete picture of the feud, including the absence of direct interaction between Perry and Reeves.
Using language that favors one side or viewpoint over others
The article uses biased language by portraying Reeves as 'enigmatic and beloved' while emphasizing Perry's struggles with addiction and bitterness towards Reeves.
Use neutral language to describe both Perry and Reeves, avoiding favoritism or negative connotations.
Using emotional language or anecdotes to manipulate the reader's feelings or opinions
The article appeals to emotion by highlighting Perry's grief over the deaths of his friends and his frustration towards Reeves, which may influence readers' perceptions without providing a balanced perspective.
Present the emotional aspects of Perry's experiences in a more objective manner, while also considering other factors that may have contributed to his feelings.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.