Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
xQc
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that is intended to provoke interest or excitement, often at the expense of accuracy
The article uses sensationalism by describing xQc's comments as 'revealing' and 'eye-popping', which exaggerates their significance.
Present the information in a more neutral and factual manner without exaggeration.
Using headlines that are intentionally vague or misleading to attract attention
The headline 'xQc Reveals Fascinating Details about His Livestreaming Contract and Gambling Deal' is misleading as the article does not provide any fascinating details, but rather discusses xQc's comments about his contracts.
Use a more accurate and descriptive headline that reflects the content of the article.
Selectively choosing data or information that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring contradictory evidence
The article cherry-picks data by focusing on xQc's potential earnings and the benefits of his contracts, without providing a balanced view of the potential risks and drawbacks.
Provide a more balanced view by discussing both the benefits and potential risks of xQc's contracts.
Leaving out important information that may provide a more complete or balanced understanding of a topic
The article omits key information about the potential negative consequences of xQc's gambling content and the ethical concerns surrounding online gambling.
Include information about the potential negative consequences of xQc's gambling content and the ethical concerns surrounding online gambling.
Using language that favors one side or viewpoint over another
The article uses biased language by describing xQc's decision to keep his contracts as 'smart' and 'beneficial', without providing a balanced perspective.
Use neutral language that presents both sides of the argument without favoring one over the other.
Presenting information in a way that favors one side or viewpoint over another
The article provides unbalanced reporting by focusing primarily on xQc's perspective and positive aspects of his contracts, while not adequately representing the perspectives of Kick and Stake.
Include perspectives from Kick and Stake to provide a more balanced representation of the situation.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.