Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Pastor and Usher
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting the story in a dramatic and exaggerated manner to provoke strong emotions.
The article uses sensational language such as 'escaped death' and 'beaten to a pulp' to create a sense of urgency and shock.
Use neutral language to describe the events without exaggeration.
Using a headline that does not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests that a pastor and church usher escaped death over an alleged missing manhood, but the article does not provide evidence to support this claim.
Use a headline that accurately reflects the content of the article.
Selectively choosing data or information that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring contradictory data.
The article focuses on the alleged missing manhood and the beating of the pastor and usher, but does not provide any context or information about the incident itself.
Provide more context and information about the incident to give a balanced perspective.
Leaving out important details or information that could provide a more complete understanding of the topic.
The article does not provide any information about the alleged victim of the missing manhood or any evidence to support the claim.
Include information about the alleged victim and any evidence that supports the claim.
Using language that favors one side or viewpoint over another.
The article uses language such as 'narrowly escaped death' and 'beaten to a pulp' to portray the pastor and usher as victims.
Use neutral language that does not favor one side over another.
Presenting information in a way that favors one side or viewpoint over another.
The article focuses on the pastor and usher as victims without providing any information or perspective from the other side.
Include information and perspective from the other side to provide a balanced view of the incident.
Using the opinion or endorsement of an authority figure to support a claim or viewpoint.
The article mentions that the state Police Public Relations Officer condemned the incident, implying that their opinion validates the claims made in the article.
Avoid relying solely on the opinion of an authority figure and provide additional evidence to support the claims made in the article.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.