Donald Trump’s comment outside court draws judge’s attention again.

[ 25/10/2023 17:54 ] Read on eastbaytimes.com

Report Overview: The article has a score of 70 out of 100, indicating that it is moderately objective. There are several instances of manipulations found in the article, including biased language, cherry-picking data, and omission of key information. These manipulations contribute to a lower objectivity score. The article presents both sides of the trial, with a slightly higher score for Donald Trump's side compared to the judge's side. However, the sides are still relatively balanced.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Donald Trump (75)

Judge Arthur Engoron (65)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Donald Trump

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Biased language

The article contains biased language that favors one side over the other.

During a break in the testimony Wednesday, Trump complained that Judge Arthur Engoron, a Democrat, is 'a very partisan judge, with a person who’s very partisan sitting along side of him, perhaps even much more partisan than he is.'

Use neutral language when describing the judge and his clerk.

Avoid using terms like 'partisan' that can introduce bias.

Cherry-picking data

The article selectively presents information to support a particular narrative.

Cohen is now a key witness in New York Attorney General Letitia James’ civil case against Trump. James alleges that Trump habitually exaggerated the value of his real estate holdings on financial documents that helped him get loans and insurance and make deals. Trump denies any wrongdoing and says James, a Democrat, is targeting the leading Republican presidential candidate in 2024 for partisan reasons.

Provide more context and evidence for the allegations against Trump.

Include counterarguments or statements from Trump's defense team.

Omission of key information

The article leaves out important details that could provide a more complete picture of the situation.

After a long pause, Cohen said, 'Yes.' Cohen worked as Trump’s lawyer and fixer for many years, before Cohen’s 2018 federal prosecution, guilty pleas and prison sentence for tax evasion, making false statements on a bank loan application, lying to Congress and making illegal contributions to Trump’s campaign.

Include more information about Cohen's background and his relationship with Trump.

Provide additional context for Cohen's credibility as a witness.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.