Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that is intended to provoke strong emotions or interest
The article uses sensationalism by emphasizing the criticism Kim Kardashian faced and framing it as her 'firing back' at her critics.
Present the information in a more neutral tone without exaggerating or sensationalizing the events.
Using headlines that are intentionally misleading or clickbait
The headline 'Kim Kardashian fires back as fans slam her for pretending she's middle class' is misleading as it implies that Kim Kardashian is responding to her fans' criticism, while the content of the article shows that she is responding to her critics.
Use a more accurate and neutral headline that reflects the content of the article.
Selectively choosing data or information that supports a particular viewpoint
The article cherry-picks comments from viewers of the podcast who criticized Kim Kardashian, without providing a balanced representation of the overall response.
Include a broader range of comments from viewers to provide a more balanced representation of the response.
Leaving out important details or information that may change the interpretation of the article
The article omits information about Kim Kardashian's full statement where she acknowledges the help she receives and emphasizes the importance of family.
Include the full statement made by Kim Kardashian to provide a more complete picture of her perspective.
Using language that favors one side or viewpoint over another
The article uses biased language by referring to Kim Kardashian's critics as 'fans' and framing their comments as 'slamming' her.
Use neutral language that does not favor one side or viewpoint over another.
Presenting information in a way that favors one side or viewpoint over another
The article focuses primarily on Kim Kardashian's response to her critics, without providing a balanced representation of their perspective.
Include more information about the criticisms made by viewers of the podcast to provide a more balanced representation of the different viewpoints.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.