Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Travis Kelce
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that is intended to provoke excitement, shock, or interest, often at the expense of accuracy
The article uses sensational language to describe Taylor Swift as a 'good luck charm' for Travis Kelce and refers to a graphic as 'the funniest graphic in sports TV history.' This sensationalism adds a biased tone to the article.
Use neutral language to describe the relationship between Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce.
Creating headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article
The headline of the article suggests that CBS broke out a 'hilarious graphic' showing Travis Kelce performs better with Taylor Swift in attendance. However, the article itself does not provide any evidence of the graphic being hilarious.
Use a headline that accurately reflects the content of the article.
Selectively choosing data that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring contradictory data
The article selectively focuses on Travis Kelce's performance when Taylor Swift is in attendance, highlighting his higher receiving yards per game. However, it fails to mention other factors that may contribute to his performance, such as the quality of the opposing team's defense.
Provide a more comprehensive analysis of Travis Kelce's performance, considering other factors that may influence his statistics.
Using language that favors one side or viewpoint over another
The article uses biased language to suggest that Taylor Swift's presence positively impacts Travis Kelce's performance, referring to her as a 'good luck charm' and using lyrics from her songs to describe his performance. This language creates a favorable narrative without considering other factors.
Use neutral language that does not favor one side or viewpoint over another.
Presenting information in a way that favors one side or viewpoint over another
The article focuses solely on the correlation between Taylor Swift's attendance and Travis Kelce's performance, without providing a balanced analysis or considering other factors that may contribute to his statistics.
Provide a more balanced analysis by considering other factors that may influence Travis Kelce's performance.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.