Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Donald Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The article uses biased language to portray Donald Trump and Jim Jordan in a negative light.
The article refers to Donald Trump as a 'self-aggrandizing megalomaniac' and Jim Jordan as a 'legislative terrorist'. These terms are subjective and derogatory, and contribute to a biased portrayal of the individuals.
Use neutral language to describe the individuals without expressing personal opinions or judgments.
The article selectively presents information to support a particular narrative.
The article mentions that Jim Jordan fell short in an initial floor vote to become the next Speaker of the House, but fails to mention the reasons behind the opposition to his bid or any potential positive aspects of his candidacy.
Provide a more balanced presentation of the information by including the reasons behind the opposition to Jim Jordan's bid and any potential positive aspects of his candidacy.
The article leaves out important details that could provide a more complete picture of the situation.
The article mentions that Jim Jordan repeatedly expounded Trump's baseless charges that the election had been stolen, but does not provide any context or evidence to support or refute these claims.
Include relevant context and evidence to support or refute the claims made by Jim Jordan regarding the election.
The article presents a one-sided view of the situation without providing alternative perspectives or counterarguments.
The article focuses primarily on negative aspects of Donald Trump and Jim Jordan's actions and does not provide alternative perspectives or counterarguments to provide a more balanced view of the situation.
Include alternative perspectives and counterarguments to provide a more balanced view of the situation.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.