Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The article contains biased language that shows a clear favoritism towards Donald Trump.
We already know that U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan is biased against Donald Trump.
Remove biased language and present a neutral perspective.
The article does not present both sides of the story and lacks balance in its reporting.
But she's going above and beyond, issuing a gag order that precludes Trump from saying anything publically about the special counsel … or defense counsel, or any of the court's staff, or 'any reasonably foreseeable witnesses.'
Include information about the reasons behind the gag order and present both sides of the argument.
The article makes claims without providing evidence or supporting sources.
We already know that U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan is biased against Donald Trump.
Provide evidence or supporting sources for the claims made in the article.
The article uses emotional language to manipulate the reader's feelings.
Imagine thinking judges don’t have political bias Appeal this overreaching nonsense.
Use neutral language and focus on presenting factual information.
The article includes personal attacks against Judge Tanya Chutkan.
We already know that U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan is biased against Donald Trump.
Avoid personal attacks and focus on discussing the facts and arguments.
The article uses sensational language to create a strong emotional response.
Learning about banana republics is not fun but interesting I'd advise blatant disregard for her order.
Use neutral language and focus on presenting factual information without exaggeration.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.