Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Donald Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that is intended to provoke excitement, shock, or interest.
The article uses sensational language to describe the conflict between Israel and Iran, such as 'deadliest Palestinian militant assault' and 'heaviest airstrikes.'
Use neutral language to describe the events without exaggeration.
Using headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline 'Donald Trump Warns of Iran's Next 'Big Move'' suggests that Trump has inside information about Iran's plans, but the article does not provide any evidence to support this claim.
Use a headline that accurately reflects the content of the article.
Selectively choosing data that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring contradictory data.
The article selectively highlights the number of people killed in Israel and Gaza, but does not provide a broader context or discuss the casualties on both sides of the conflict.
Provide a more balanced and comprehensive view of the casualties on both sides of the conflict.
Using language that favors one side or viewpoint over another.
The article uses biased language to describe Joe Biden as 'the worst and most incompetent president in the history of the United States' and accuses the Biden administration of being responsible for 'unprecedented death and destruction.'
Use neutral language when describing political figures and events.
Presenting information in a way that favors one side or viewpoint over another.
The article focuses primarily on Donald Trump's perspective and criticisms of the Biden administration, while providing limited information about the perspectives of other stakeholders in the conflict.
Include a more diverse range of perspectives and provide a balanced view of the conflict.
Making claims without providing evidence or supporting sources.
The article repeats Donald Trump's unsubstantiated claim that the 2020 presidential election was rigged and stolen, without providing any evidence to support this claim.
Avoid repeating unsubstantiated claims without providing evidence or supporting sources.
Using the opinion or endorsement of an authority figure to support a claim.
The article quotes Donald Trump's statement about Joe Biden being the worst and most incompetent president in the history of the United States, using his status as a former president to lend credibility to the claim.
Evaluate claims based on their own merits rather than relying on the authority of the person making the claim.
Presenting two opposing viewpoints as equally valid, even when one is supported by more evidence or expert consensus.
The article presents Donald Trump's criticisms of the Biden administration as equally valid to other perspectives, without providing evidence or expert analysis to support these claims.
Provide evidence or expert analysis to support claims and avoid presenting false equivalence.
Misrepresenting or manipulating facts to support a particular viewpoint.
The article distorts the facts by suggesting a causal relationship between the alleged rigging of the 2020 presidential election and the conflict between Israel and Iran, without providing any evidence to support this claim.
Present facts accurately and avoid making unsupported claims or connections.
Assuming that because two events occur together, one must have caused the other.
The article suggests that the alleged rigging of the 2020 presidential election caused the conflict between Israel and Iran, without providing any evidence to support this causal relationship.
Avoid making causal claims without sufficient evidence to support them.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.