Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The article uses sensational language to grab attention and create a dramatic effect.
Donald Trump ‘s top corporate deputies considered adding a “presidential premium” to his Trump Tower penthouse, Mar-a-Lago resort and other assets during his White House years, a gambit that would’ve padded his net worth by nearly $145 million, an executive at the former president’s company testified Friday.
Use neutral language to present the information without exaggeration.
Provide more context and evidence to support the claim of padding Trump's net worth.
The headline of the article is misleading and does not accurately reflect the content of the article.
Executive at Donald Trump's company says 'presidential premium' was floated to boost bottom line
Use a more accurate and objective headline that reflects the content of the article.
The article omits important details and context that could provide a more balanced and objective view of the situation.
The article does not provide information about the outcome of the trial or the arguments presented by both sides.
Include information about the outcome of the trial and the arguments presented by both sides to provide a more complete picture.
The article uses biased language that favors one side over the other.
State lawyers contend that merely going through the exercise underscores how Trump and his underlings were intent on finding ways to beef up his bottom line.
Use neutral language to present the arguments of both sides without favoring one over the other.
The article presents information in a way that favors one side over the other.
The article focuses more on the actions of Trump and his company, while providing limited information about the arguments and evidence presented by state lawyers.
Provide a more balanced presentation of the arguments and evidence presented by both sides.
The article selectively uses sources that support a particular narrative or viewpoint.
The article primarily relies on the testimony of Trump Organization executives and does not include perspectives from other sources or experts.
Include perspectives from other sources or experts to provide a more comprehensive view of the situation.
The article includes claims that are not supported by sufficient evidence.
The article claims that Trump and his underlings were intent on finding ways to beef up his bottom line, but does not provide concrete evidence to support this claim.
Provide concrete evidence to support the claim that Trump and his underlings were intent on finding ways to beef up his bottom line.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.