Executive at Donald Trump’s company says 'presidential premium' was floated to boost bottom line.

[ 13/10/2023 20:53 ] Read on dailykos.com

Report Overview: The article has a score of 70 out of 100, indicating that it is moderately objective. There are several instances of manipulations found in the article, including sensationalism, omission of key information, biased language, and unbalanced reporting. These manipulations contribute to a lower objectivity score. The article primarily focuses on the actions of Donald Trump and his company, with less emphasis on the opposing viewpoint or counterarguments. This unbalanced reporting contributes to a lower score for the side that is not favored in the article.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Donald Trump (80)

Opposing viewpoint (60)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Donald Trump

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Sensationalism

The article uses sensational language to grab attention and create a dramatic effect.

The article uses phrases like 'boost bottom line,' 'padded his net worth,' and 'finding ways to beef up his bottom line' to create a sense of scandal and wrongdoing.

Use neutral language to describe the actions without adding unnecessary drama.

Focus on the facts and avoid using exaggerated language.

Omission of key information

The article fails to provide important context or details that could provide a more balanced perspective.

The article does not include any statements or perspectives from individuals who may support or defend Donald Trump's actions.

Include statements or perspectives from individuals who may have a different viewpoint or defend Donald Trump's actions.

Provide more context and background information to give readers a more complete understanding of the situation.

Biased language

The article uses language that shows a clear bias against Donald Trump and his company.

The article refers to 'Trump and his underlings' and 'Trump executives' in a negative tone, suggesting wrongdoing or unethical behavior.

Use neutral language when referring to individuals or groups involved.

Avoid using language that implies guilt or wrongdoing without sufficient evidence.

Unbalanced reporting

The article focuses primarily on one side of the story, without providing sufficient coverage or representation of opposing viewpoints.

The article heavily emphasizes the actions and intentions of Donald Trump and his company, while providing limited information or perspectives from the opposing side.

Include more information and perspectives from the opposing side to provide a more balanced view of the situation.

Ensure that both sides of the story are given equal coverage and representation.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.