Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Mike Flanagan
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that provokes strong emotions or interest, often at the expense of accuracy.
Horror is inherently psychological. That ghost, monster, or indestructible serial killer? A stand-in for some mental or emotional problem.
Present the information in a more neutral and factual manner.
Avoid using exaggerated language to describe the subject.
Using language that favors one side or perspective over another.
That’s why writer-director Mike Flanagan is so refreshing: He honors the supernatural imperatives of ghost stories or vampire tales, but ensures they happen to people we care about, heroes capable of getting sober or overcoming generational trauma.
Use neutral language to describe the director's approach.
Avoid making subjective claims about the director's work.
Selectively choosing data or evidence that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring contradictory information.
Flanagan fans (Fanagans?) are familiar with his formula: modern riffs on classic weird lit strewn with Easter eggs from the particular author’s oeuvre.
Provide a more balanced representation of the director's work, including both positive and negative aspects.
Avoid focusing only on the positive aspects of the director's work.
Leaving out important details or facts that could provide a more complete understanding of the subject.
The series unfolds as a string of morality tales in which the sins of the father are visited upon the equally corrupt heads of the offspring. Given the ultra-rich family and Big Pharma context, one assumes that Flanagan was taking notes on and .
Include more information about the series and its themes to provide a clearer context.
Avoid making assumptions and provide factual information instead.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.