Hamas attack on Israel would have not happened if I was still US President: Donald Trump.

[ 08/10/2023 18:05 ] Read on news9live.com

Report Overview: The article has a score of 60 out of 100, indicating that it contains a moderate level of objectivity. While some statements are objective, there are also instances of manipulations such as sensationalism, biased language, and cherry-picking data. The article favors the side of Donald Trump, as he is portrayed as the solution to the conflict and blames President Joe Biden for the attack.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Donald Trump (80)

Hamas (40)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Donald Trump

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Sensationalism

Presenting the conflict in an exaggerated and dramatic manner to evoke strong emotions.

The article describes the attack as 'unprecedented' and mentions 'hundreds of lives' being claimed on both sides. This sensational language adds drama to the situation.

Use neutral language to describe the attack without exaggeration.

Biased language

Using language that favors one side over the other.

The article quotes Donald Trump blaming President Joe Biden and calling him 'weak'. This biased language portrays Trump as the solution to the conflict and Biden as the cause.

Use neutral language when quoting statements from both sides.

Cherry-picking data

Selectively choosing data or information that supports a particular narrative.

The article selectively quotes Donald Trump's statements about geopolitical conflicts that would not have happened if he was still the President. This cherry-picking of data supports the narrative that Trump would have prevented the attack.

Provide a more balanced representation of Trump's statements by including any counterarguments or opposing viewpoints.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.