Former Twitter CEO Parag Agarwal and Censorship Queen Vijaya Gadde Beat Elon Musk in Court.

[ 04/10/2023 19:45 ] Read on breitbart.com

Report Overview: The article contains several manipulations such as biased language, cherry-picking data, omission of key information, and appeal to authority. These manipulations contribute to a lack of objectivity in the article.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Elon Musk (40)

Former Twitter Executives (80)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Former Twitter Executives

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Biased language

The article uses biased language to describe the former Twitter executives as 'infamous censorship queen' and 'driving force of censorship.' This language portrays them in a negative light and influences the reader's perception.

Former top lawyer and infamous censorship queen, Vijaya Gadde

Use neutral language to describe the former Twitter executives.

Cherry-picking data

The article selectively presents information about the legal dispute between Elon Musk's X Corp. and the former Twitter executives. It focuses on the court ruling against Musk's company and portrays it as a rare loss for him, while neglecting to provide a balanced view of the case.

The decision, handed down by a Delaware judge, marks a rare courtroom loss for Elon Musk, who is used to winning legal challenges.

Provide a more balanced view of the legal dispute by including relevant information about Musk's arguments or any previous legal victories he has had.

Omission of key information

The article fails to provide important context about the legal fees dispute between Elon Musk's X Corp. and the former Twitter executives. It does not mention the specific reasons why the executives claimed the company had failed to adhere to its own bylaws.

They contended that X/Twitter neglected its duty to cover legal costs that were directly related to investigations into the company’s operations during their tenure.

Include the specific reasons provided by the former executives for their claim that X/Twitter neglected its duty to cover legal costs.

Appeal to authority

The article appeals to the authority of Breitbart News and its reporter, Lucas Nolan, to support its claims about the former Twitter executives and their involvement in censorship.

As Breitbart News previously reported, Gadde was integral to the censorship of the Hunter Biden 'Laptop from Hell.'

Provide additional sources or evidence to support the claims about the former Twitter executives' involvement in censorship.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.