Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Democrats
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The article uses sensational language to grab attention and create excitement.
The article refers to the ousting of the former Speaker of the House as a 'mini-coup' and describes the House Clown Caucus. These phrases are meant to create a sense of drama and entertainment.
Use neutral language to describe events and individuals.
Focus on providing factual information rather than using sensational language.
The article uses language that shows a clear bias towards certain individuals or groups.
The article refers to Georgia's Marjorie Taylor Greene, Texas' Troy Nehls, and Florida Man Greg Steube as members of the 'House Clown Caucus.' This derogatory term shows a bias against these individuals.
Use neutral language when referring to individuals or groups.
Avoid using derogatory terms that show bias.
The article selectively presents information to support a particular viewpoint.
The article presents a list of nominees for Speaker of the House, but only provides positive attributes for each nominee without considering any potential drawbacks or criticisms.
Present a balanced view of each nominee by including potential drawbacks or criticisms.
Provide a more comprehensive analysis of each nominee's qualifications.
The article does not provide equal representation or consideration of different perspectives.
The article focuses primarily on presenting nominees for Speaker of the House who are not members of Congress, without providing an equal discussion of the potential benefits and drawbacks of having a non-member as Speaker.
Include a discussion of the potential benefits and drawbacks of having a non-member as Speaker of the House.
Provide a more balanced representation of different perspectives on the issue.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.