Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Donald Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that is intended to provoke excitement, shock, or interest.
The article uses sensationalism in the title by suggesting that RFK Jr.'s independent bid would have a significant impact on the election outcome.
Change the title to accurately reflect the survey findings without exaggeration.
Using headlines that are intentionally vague or misleading to attract attention.
The headline suggests that RFK Jr.'s independent bid would only help Trump and hurt Biden, without providing a balanced analysis of the potential impact.
Provide a more balanced headline that accurately reflects the survey findings.
Selectively choosing data that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring contradictory data.
The article selectively highlights the survey results that show Trump's lead expanding with Kennedy as an independent candidate, without providing a comprehensive analysis of other factors that could influence the election outcome.
Provide a more comprehensive analysis of the survey results, including potential limitations and other factors that could impact the election.
Leaving out important information that could provide a more complete understanding of the topic.
The article fails to mention the sample size and methodology of the survey, which is important for evaluating the reliability of the findings.
Include information about the sample size and methodology of the survey to provide a more complete understanding of the findings.
Using language that favors one side or viewpoint over another.
The article uses language that suggests Democrats are more negatively affected by Kennedy's independent run than Republicans, without providing sufficient evidence or analysis to support this claim.
Use neutral language and provide evidence or analysis to support any claims about the impact of Kennedy's independent run on different political parties.
Presenting information in a way that favors one side or viewpoint over another.
The article focuses primarily on the potential negative impact of Kennedy's independent run on Democrats, without providing a balanced analysis of the potential impact on Republicans.
Provide a more balanced analysis of the potential impact of Kennedy's independent run on both Democrats and Republicans.
Using the opinion or endorsement of an authority figure to support a claim.
The article includes quotes from a Kennedy campaign insider and Democrat National Committee Chairman Jaime Harrison to support the claim that Kennedy's independent run could have negative ramifications for Democrats.
Provide a more diverse range of perspectives and evidence to support any claims about the potential impact of Kennedy's independent run.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.